Exploring the impact of broadband and technology on our lives, our businesses, and our communities.
The free online encyclopedia Wikipedia has refused the Chinese government's request to remove certain material from the Wikipedia Web site, and in retaliation, the Chinese have blocked access to Wikipedia for everyone in China. Unlike other the leaders of other companies like Microsoft, Google and Yahoo!, who have collaborated with the Chinese government and agreed to assist with censorship, Jimmy Wales, the founder of Wikipedia, has taken a principled stand and refused to participate in censorship.
Apparently, among the items the Chinese want removed are articles about Tiananmen Square and the massacre of thousands of Chinese students by the Communist government. Wales will continue to meet with Chinese officials to encourage them to allow complete access to Wikipedia.
Amazon is offering an eBook. Dozens of companies lost their shirts with ebooks in the late nineties. Back then, laptops were expensive and PDAs had tiny screens and were hard to read (Apple's Newton was the exception). So many thought that ebooks--light, portable readers--would catch on. But the number of titles available for any given platform were limited, and too many manufacturers opted for proprietary book formats that made publishing a nightmare. A successful book might have to be made available in several different formats. At least one company (I can't remember the name) had the good sense to adopt PDF as the file format, but nonetheless, ebooks never really caught on.
File formats were just part of the problem. There was also digital rights management, the mechanics of buying, downloading, and installling the files was another, battery life was yet another issue, finally, some were awkward to use. It's hard to beat books, which have had hundreds of years of design packed into the format.
Amazon's design has a keyboard (for taking notes, which was usually impossible with earlier ebook systems), probably uses e-ink, which extends battery life, and comes with EVDO wireless, meaning you can download books easily and probably also does email and other common chores.
It will be interesting to see how this does. If Amazon can afford to play the "give away the razor, make money on the blades" game and sell it cheap with the hope of making it up on book sales, it could catch on--if the books are cheap enough.
Despite the popularity of online music sites like iTunes, music prices did not come down any because music publishing houses were and still are greedy--they want all the money they used to make on CD sales, but they no longer have any distribution costs. If book publishers take the same route, Amazon may have tough sledding. And if it is hard for authors and publishers to prepare a manuscript for the ebook, it may be even worse.
Having said all that, I think ebooks are inevitable. A lot of books are read once and discarded, and many technical books have time sensitive material that becomes less useful in just a year or two. And the high cost of college textbooks could be brought down with cheap ebooks. So we will have ebooks; what is uncertain is what platform we will read them on. Most of us don't want both a laptop and a second ebook "thing." We'd rather have a single device that serves as both, and a tablet computer would do nicely.
This article argues that the age of the iPod may be over. For the last two quarters, iPod sales have fallen slightly, if you can call selling more than 8 million of the devices in each quarter "slow sales." The theory is that because so many people have iPods that youth no longer see them as cool. I guess it is pretty horrifying to discover that your grandfather has the same music player that you do.
Another theory, and a more likely one, I think, is that phones with music players are beginning to eat into iPod sales. It's what I call the "one too many gadgets" problem. If you can buy something that eliminates a gadget and charger, you may be motivated to get it and drop the other gadget. But there was much wailing and gnashing of teeth a couple of years ago when most cellphones began adding camera features. After a while, most people figured out that the cellphone cameras took really crummy pictures and kept buying digital cameras.
The most likely explanation is that nearly everyone who wants an iPod has one. There is no market that can continually sustain double digit growth. Eventually you have sold your widget to everyone. At that point, the market matures and sales are primarily replacement units. Tomorrow, Apple is supposed to announce movies for sale on the iTunes store. Recall that when the iTunes store opened, few thought it would amount to anything. Since then, nearly every record company has had to begrudgingly admit the world has changed. There are dozens of competitors to Apple selling online music, and the there are already several other online movie stores in the wings.
Downloadable movies may spur sales of the bigger iPods with hard drives, because they have the storage space for movies. Apple may have the last laugh yet.
I am constantly surprised at the number of corporate phone systems that ask you to enter your account number, and then as soon as you get a human (if you get a human), they ask you to enter the very same number again.
I called Marriott to make a hotel reservation, and was pleasantly surprised. I entered my frequent traveler number, and was taken to a real live human almost immediately, who greeted me by name; the system transferred the call and put my customer information up on the screen for the agent. That's the way IT is supposed to work. Marriott's IT department is doing its job--not something you can say about a lot of other companies.
Disney intends to start fingerprinting inmates, er, I mean "guests" at Disneyworld. The company claims it needs to do this to prevent "ticket fraud," but this is rubbish. There are other ways to combat ticket fraud that don't include collecting biometric data. Biometric fingerprint data allows the company to uniquely identify everyone who visits, forever. It is the ultimate in marketing research and analysis, and don't think they won't try to sell it or use it for other purposes. Expect Google to be lining up to grab this data from the giant mouse; it fits nicely with Google's plan to eavesdrop inside our homes.
Henrico County, Virginia, has garnered national attention for its program of giving laptops to kids once they reach sixth grade. But if the school system is not prepared to truly transform the teaching and learning process, the results may not be what we expect. In this article, at least one mother made her daughter give the laptop back because it had become a time waster for the girl and her grades had dropped.
It is easy to blame it on kids spending too much time chatting and goofing off on online Web sites, but those are only symptoms of the real problem. I can take some of the blame for all this, as the Blacksburg Electronic Village project helped our county schools become the first school system in the country to have broadband to every school and to become the first school system in the country to have broadband in every classroom. Since then I have worked on many other K12 technology projects--all with the best of intentions, but the results have been mixed at best.
Teaching kids is a complext process that requires years of experience, and you can't just drop a few computers into the middle of a centuries old way of doing things and expect magical results. I have learned that the hard way. In my experience, it is school administrators that are most often at fault. They are eager to win grants and push technology into the classroom; it looks good to parents and to elected leaders that decide school budgets.
But those same administrators are often much less enthusiastic about actually rolling up their sleeves, working side by side with teachers, and trying to figure out what changes need to be made to really leverage the promise of all this technology. And there is what I call the "five percent problem." Dump a bunch of technology into a school, and under any circumstances, you will have about five percent of teachers who are motivated to dig in and do amazing things with the stuff. Those "five percent" projects become the poster children for technology in the classroom. They are used to say, "See what great stuff all this is!"
But those five percenters are the exception, not the rule. Most teachers need a lot of help and support from the top down to get comparable results, and it usually is not there. So while computer manufacturers make money selling computers to schools, our kids are still learning the same old way. If your school district wants money for technology efforts, ask some hard questions about how administrators intend to support teachers with good tech support, appropriate learning resources, and assistance with curriculum changes.
Just when you thought Google can't possibly get any creepier, they come up with something so far out there your jaw just drops open. According to the Register, Google's techies have been playing with the microphones on your computer. They have figured out how to turn them on and listen to the conversation in the room, and/or what you are watching on TV. Why would they want to do this? So they can better "understand" you and what kinds of advertisements to show you. According to the Register, Google says it won't actually listen to conversations--it just wants to track what you watch on TV. Uh huh. And any time they change their minds, they don't have to tell you, either.
You might ask, "How can they do this? How can listen in on the microphone on MY computer?" Well, the next time download Google Desktop, it could have the ability to do this, and it works because you chose to download the software, install it, and let it run on your desktop.
Creepy. Just plain creepy. As I have been saying for years, it is not the government that I worry about--we have safeguards that keep the government reasonably accountable most of the time. But Google is accountable to no one, and we are so enamored of all this "free" software and services that we are giving our privacy away--no government snooping even needed!
This article demonstrates how easy it is for others to snoop around in your personal affairs if you like to use "free" services like Google Calendar. The author, simply by clicking on calendar items and using the information to dig up additional detail, was quickly able to identify where a woman lived and when she would be out of the house (handy for burglars).
Google Calendar has a privacy setting, but not everyone uses it. Sharing a calendar with your friends and family often has the unintended side effect of sharing it with everyone else in the world. Use these services carefully, and never, ever let your children use these.
Swedish-Finnish telecom company TeliaSonera has started selling hybrid phones that will automatically make phone calls via the Internet when in range of a WiFi hotspot, and use the normal cellphone network when not in a hotspot. Some other dual mode phones have been available, but this is the first phone (manufactured by Samsung) that will switch automatically between the two. The firm is targeting in home use first, which is clever, because we make a lot of calls from home. If you have a wireless router in your house, the phone will automatically make VoIP calls, saving money.
Devices like this illustrate the need to design communitywide broadband networks that offer BOTH fiber and wireless connectivity. We are going to want and need both, and communities should plan and design for both.
The owner of 26 Massachusetts and Rhode Island papers is thinking about selling the whole lot and simply publishing on the Web, where he says ad revenues are higher. It's about time somebody in the newspaper business acknowledged that putting gobs of ink on dead trees and tossing the finished product onto people's driveways is not the best way to do things anymore.
The Web is a nearly perfect news distribution medium--virtually zero distribution costs and the potential for nearly unlimited content. All that is needed is thoughtful editing, which is still dreadfully short on the Web. As I've been saying since 1993, it could be the Golden Age for newspapers, if they fire everybody, get some people that have a clue, and toss their printing presses away.