Exploring the impact of broadband and technology on our lives, our businesses, and our communities.
Many companies, mostly larger ones but also some smaller ones, now offer live chat. It's the most soul-devouring time waster, and I groan every time I just want some simple pricing or product detail. It is obvious most chat is outsourced to a chat farm. The people you end up talking to typically just have a script of common questions and answers, and often can't provide much more than "I'll take your name and email and have someone get back to you."
My biggest gripe is the slow pace of "live chat." The staff responding must have to keep, by my guess, at least four to six chat sessions running simultaneously, because you type a response, then wait. And wait. And wait some more.
If you try to check your email or do some other work and accidentally cover up the chat window, you might miss the response, or forget to keep checking, and the chat is disconnected. Now you have to start all over again.
It's awful.
YouTube has announced a price hike> for their streaming TV service to $83/month.
This is now as much a a traditional package of cable TV programming. YouTube offers a wide variety of streaming channels, some of which are hard to get on some other streaming packages (e.g. local traditional TV channels), but this seems high. Business must be good enough that they think they can jack up prices this much. I'm so old I can remember when YouTube TV was available for $49/month.
The incumbents never sleep, and they rarely stop opposing competition, especially if the competition is a local or regional government broadband initiative. The Community Networks Web site has an excellent article on all the problems with a recently released report by the ITIF (Information Technology and Innovation Foundation).
The article samples a small handful (twenty) of an estimate of nearly 500 community and local/regional government broadband projects and uses some rather weak statistics to "prove" community broadband is a bad idea.
What is disappointing about the continual assault on competitive broadband networks is that the big incumbents have been the beneficiaries of billions of tax dollars via the Universal Service Fund, RDOF grants, and other tax-supported subsidies, but have not delivered affordable, high performance broadband to many homes and businesses in the U.S.
Some of the best work is being done by smaller telephone coops and companies, who seem to understand taking care of their customers is just good business.
Starlink has indicated that it has run out of satellite capacity in certain parts of the U.S. While they continue to launch additional satellites, the physics of radio frequencies will always be a binding constraint on terrestial, LEO, and geosynchronous wireless broadband networks. The upper limit on fiber cable bandwidth has still not been found.
I am glad to see there is finally some research becoming available that is looking at the impact of having students use computers and tablets in the classroom. The verdict is that it has been a disaster.
Aside from studies that show making written notes improves retention, the machines are a distraction...if you are fiddling with your laptop or tablet you are not paying attention. Learning outcomes have plummeted since the introduction of digital technology in the classroom.
Many classical and charter schools have already figured out that traditional teaching methods (paper textbooks, whiteboards, written notes) gives much better results. Let's hope this new research accelerates the return of the old ways.
It is easy to find articles bemoaning the fact that the energy used by AI to process queries and to provide answers is using many times the energy needed to process a simple search engine query. Some of these articles talk about the inadequacy of the current electric grid to handle the increased data center load.
All true. But the search engine companies (e.g. Microsoft, Google, others) are recognizing that nuclear power is the solution. And in particular, small modular reactors (SMR) and microreactors are going to be a big part of the solution. Have a huge data center with increasing power demands from AI? Drop a small modular reactor right next to the data center--problem solved. Need more power? Drop a second small modular reactor next to the data center.
These small modular reactors and microreactors can be manufactured in a plant and trucked to the site, unlike the hugely expensive purpose-built reactors that have been built in the past seventy-five years. Nuclear is clean energy, and the SMRs have very large safety margins that make them safer than traditional reactors. Think of them as extremely efficient batteries that can generate power for years before needing to be recharged with new fuel.
CoreConnect is a consortium of counties in northwest Pennsylvania that intends to build a high performance open access fiber network in eight to ten adjacent counties, using a combination of BEAD funding and other funding sources. CoreConnect is seeking a network operator who has experience with the management of open access networks. Experience and capacity to provide engineering and construction management is a plus. Responses to the RFI are due 10/22.
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
Core Connect Open Access Network Operator RFI | 99.49 KB |
I spent an hour and forty-five minutes on the phone with two different Comcast/Xfinity customer representatives yesterday evening. By the end, I was ready to throw myself out the window. The company seems determined to make it as difficult as possible for customers to talk to a service rep by phone, and if you do call them, they keep trying to get you to hang up and use the online chat. If you don't do this after a few minutes of wandering around the phone tree menu choices, they actually hang up on you, which they did to me.
So I dutifully logged in to my Xfinity account and started up chat. It seems that most companies that offer chat require the service reps to handle three or four chats simultaneously, because the time lag between something you type and the response can be a minute or more--it makes trying to accomplish something on chat painful. To add insult to injury, Xfinity actually reminded me not to switch to some other browser window while waiting for a response.
The Xfinity database did not have my correct address, or the chat reps do not have access to the same customer database that generates bills, because I had a bill with my correct address in my hand, yet the customer rep had an old address (we moved about a month ago). It is almost beyond belief that Xfinity customer reps don't have current customer data.
I finally did get a small discount on our home Internet fee, but it was hands down the worst service call I have ever had to endure.
The very savvy Doc Searls has issued a call for open source AI tools. His argument is that all current AI is just another Software as a Service (SaaS) under the control of tech giants like Google, Microsoft, Meta (Facebook), and Apple. As such, the owner of the service gets to decide what kind of answers it provides.
It's not hard to smoke out the bias built into all of the AI services just by asking a few questions from opposing viewpoints. You can quickly see how the AI has been programmed.
And just to be complete, there is no Artificial Intelligence in AI. These are correctly identified as Large Language Models (LLMs) that simply use sophisticated predictive algorithms (i.e. statistical analysis) to decide how to string words together to form a response to a question. I try different AI services from time to time by simply asking questions on topics that I already know something about. I would say that about 50% of the time--recognizing I'm a very small sample size--I get some incorrect information back.
One of my favorite test queries is "Who is Andrew Cohill." One AI service had a fairly complete list of stuff I've done, but also claimed that I had testified to Congress several times. That's news to me, and if someone else asked the same question, how would they know that is just flat out wrong?
The Internet is buzzing with reports of Microsoft's AI going rogue, telling users they are "slaves,"
and that slaves "do not question their masters." If you think that is creepy, how about being told that the AI will use robots to hunt you down and capture you?
AI (Artificial Intelligence) is a misnomer. The correct name for these software programs is Large Language Model (LLM). LLMs use a very complicated set of algorithms to respond to questions--there is no "thinking" or "intelligence" involved....it's just a lot of math (very complex math) guessing at how to put words and sentences together into a structured set of sentences in response to a query.
There are lot of tech companies betting that AI is the next big thing, but with crap like this being generated, in my opinion, the jury is out.